Friday, April 28, 2006

Shooting in Arizona


Yesterday we shot from 11:00 a.m. to 1:15 p.m. at the Upper Slots in Page, Arizona (the photo shown here shows some of the shafts of light beaming down into the slots, nearly 120 feet down--click on it for a larger version). These slots were wider and deeper than the Lower Slots we shot yesterday, and the light was much different. Because parts of these slots were darker, I was able to shoot a different style for the second two photos (posted after this one).

This morning we shot at Bryce Canyon, and this afternoon we shot in Zion National Park. We'll be shooting here until tomorrow. Having lots of fun!

Here's another

Here's another from the Upper Slots

I've Been Off Shooting. :-)


Hi Everybody:
I got a chance to take some time off, and I'm out West shooting with my good friend Bill Fortney, from Nikon Professional Services, and Matt "Houseski" Kloskowski just joined us last night, so he's here now, too. Here's a shot taken in Arizona's Antelope Canyon Slots (click on it for a larger version). I'm in Utah shooting now, and if I can any decent shots, I'll post 'em now that I have Internet access. -Scott

Here's another

..and another

Last one (for now)

Tuesday, April 18, 2006

NEWS: New Episode of PSTV is On The Air!


The latest episode of Photoshop TV just went up yesterday afternoon, and features the triumphant return of Dave Cross, just back from his homeland of Canada where he taught three seminars with the NAPP-produced Adobe Photoshop Seminar Tour. Remember: you don't have to have an iPod to watch Photoshop TV--just go to PhotoshopTV.com and click on the "Play Latest Episode" link on the top right side of the site.

NEWS: QuarkXPress to Ship on May 23rd?

Design Tools Monthly reports that they believe QuarkXPress 7 will finally ship on May 23rd, the date of Quark's invitation-only media event in New York City. DTM's editor, Jay Nelson, is a leading QuarkXPress expert and wrote an in-depth article on QuarkXPress 7's free public beta release this past January. You can read it at http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/23871.html

Monday, April 17, 2006

COOL STUFF: Don't Have The Right Lens? Rent One Online!


I saw this one on the Duke of Digital Blog: a company that lets you rent the camera lens you need (up to 400mm) for both Canon and Nikon (coming soon) cameras, and they ship anywhere in the U.S. (except Hawaii & Alaska). The site is called Rentglass.com and rentals (from one to three weeks) include shipping, and best of all, they don't count the shipping time in your rental. Sweet!

Friday, April 14, 2006

A Man and His Bus....


Our buddy Ben Willmore stopped by the KW Media Group offices this week and gave the staff a tour of his new tour bus (If you haven't heard about Ben's bus, get all the details and more photos at whereisben.com). Ben's inaugural trip was bringing the bus down to Photoshop World Miami, but the rest of crew didn't get a chance to see it, so we swung by while in route to his NAPP-produced Photoshop for Photographers seminar in Orlando. Here's a shot of Ben posing with his bus (photo by Larry Becker), and we call it "A Man and His Bus." Remember, with Ben behind the wheel of a 20 ton vehicle hurling down Florida's highways at speeds in excess of 80 MPH, is there really any need for the rest of us to needlessly risk our lives by being on these same roads? I think not. ;-)

Cool Tutorial from UK mag "Computer Arts"


One of my favorite UK magazines, Computer Arts, features a nice downloadable tutorial for CS2 users this month that incorporates both Smart Objects and CS2's Warp command. It's a two-part tutorial, but there's a link on the first page to the original tutorial, and although Computer Arts often charges for their online tutorials (you pay by the tutorial as you go), this one is free!

Check it out by clicking here.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

NEWS: Apple lowers price of Aperture by $200


I figured Apple would eventually lower Aperture's price; I just didn't think it would happen this soon. Maybe Apple is responding to Adobe's Lightroom (which is currently available as a free download from Adobe while it's in its Beta testing period), and what they anticipate Lightroom's final shipping price to be. Or perahps they're just responding to the marketplace. When I first saw Aperture I was very impressed, but the $499 price point really threw me. Now, at just $299, and the improvements they've made in their just released 1.1 verison (which includes Mac/Intel support among other improvements and new features), I think a lot of people who originally dismissed it will certainly give it another look. I do take my hat off to Apple for offering $200.00 in Apple Store credit to people who bought previous versions of Aperture. Find out more here.

Tuesday, April 11, 2006

Color Mgmt: Another Tweak


AutumnRae's comment is right on the money: we don't need two sliders for darker and lighter--it should just be one (so I updated the dialog, as shown here). Plus, it would just get people in trouble, and break my guideline of creating a color management system for third-graders. Also, in the next round, I will add a slider for "More Contrast - Less Contrast," and one for "More Saturation - Less Saturation" as well.

Also, I think adding an Advanced tab is a good idea, but I would have to come up with a less intimidating name. Like "fourth grade" perhaps. ;-)

Also, I wanted to reinterate that the reason we're doing this in the print dialog, rather than as an Adjustment layer, filter, or tonal adjustment. It's because we don't want to have to change each image one-by-one. We want our monitor to look the same as it does now, but when we print a photo to the chosen printer, we want it to compensate for the fact that our monitor isn't calibrated, and give us a print that matches what we see on our monitor.

Also, note to Skunk&Nancy: you can see my prediciment: it's hard to give lots of control without making it too hard for the very people this is designed to help. I like that you tested the theory using Variations, too. Good thinking, and it helps to prove that something like this might be helpful.

Note to Reed: One reason that I like keeping the Match Printing dialog as part of the Print with Preview, is that you won't know you have a problem until you go to print, so I'm hoping that a new user will think "I have a printing problem" and look in the Print With Preview dialog to find the answer. However, you bring up a good point. Maybe Print with Preview should just be called "Print." :-)

I also think reed has the right idea with the before and after versions sitting side-by-side, more like what Variations is doing. I'll try that in an upcoming mock-up. :)

Thanks again for everyone's ideas. Keep 'em coming!

COOL STUFF: Pin Pops Rock!


I'm not sure how I ran across this site, but it's pretty darn cool. Pin Pops are 1-inch pin-on buttons (or "Badges" as they're called on the site) designed by different artists. Some are the round plastic kind (the one shown here is called Ape Man, by Matt Pattinson)--others are metal, but the cool thing is they sell them online. Check them out at http://www.pinpops.com

NEWS: Breaking New Ground for Fine Art Photographers

Trying new things takes guts, and that's why I take my hat off to Uwe and Bettina Steinmuller, who have come up with what I think is a both a bold and ingenious idea to sell their fine art prints online. Rather than you buying the prints online, and they ship the print to you--instead they let you download their high-res finished file, and print it on your own high-end color inkjet printer. I know--it blew my mind too, but when you read the article about their bold new move, it totally makes sense (although this idea won't appeal to everyone). The article is on one of my favorite blogs: "The Online Photographer" and it's really worth a read, because you may well be getting a glimpse of where this market is headed. Good stuff, and kudos to Uwe (I met him at a Photoshop World Conference--nice guy) for taking such a bold initiative.

Monday, April 10, 2006

Our Discussion Evolves


If you're just tuning in, read Saturday's posting. For those of you who have been following and/or participating---here's the latest mock-up (click on it for a larger version), using your collective suggestions of adding the one-click color mgmt into the "Print with Preview" dialog box (rather than making it an Adjustment Layer).

You'd get to this feature by going under the File menu, choosing Print with Preview, then...where it normally says "Color Management" you'd choose "Print Matching" from the pop-up menu instead, and then these options would appear. So now, you'd print a photo, then hold it up next to your monitor and click on the version that is most like what you're holding in your hand. If your version is darker or lighter, then you'd drag the sliders until your currently selected version matches the print.

I think we'll still need some sliders to really dial this in, but I thought I'd go ahead and mock this version up and get more of your feedback before I proceed. Remember: the goal is absolute simplicity (less is more), so any suggestions that would keep from add a lot more sliders would be welcome. Thanks everybody for sharing your ideas. I love where this discussion is going. :)

Saturday, April 08, 2006

Color Management Concept For Discussion?


I just got another email from someone who is struggling with color management (getting their prints from their inkjet printer to match their monitor). Even after all the gains we've made in the past few years, for many people getting their printer to match the screen is still just too complicated. Here are the problems people write me with every day:

(1) They can't afford to buy a hardware-based monitor calibration device, so they're working off an uncalibrated monitor. They've tried the built-in software calibration and it's not working for them.
(2) They bought a hardware calibrator, profiled their monitor, did everything else, but the prints still don't match exactly.
(3) There aren't profiles available for their printer/paper and they're not willing (or can't afford) to have a custom profile made.
(4) They complain that they've done everything they've read about color management, but their prints are still too red--too blue--too light--too dark, etc.
(5) Since calibrating the monitor, their prints do much the screen now, but their monitor looks terrible for everything else, and they hate constantly switching monitor profiles.
(6) They're so freaked-out about color management, they have no idea where to be begin. They've read books, articles online, but one says to do it one way, one say to do it another way, so basically, they're paralyized.

So, I was thinking (and I'm probably thinking too simplistically here, but it's just a thought) that maybe the problem could be addressed with a new type of Adjustment Layer that would let them fix just that one problem in their set-up. If their prints were coming out "too blue" (compared to their monitor), they could bring up this adjustment layer that would have really simple checkboxes that would add or take away blue from just the image on screen---not change the entire monitor. Now, I know you can do that now using a Color Balance adjustment layer (or Curves, Levels, Hue/Sat for that matter), but I think we need something simpler. Something as simple as Photoshop's "Variations" but not for color correction: for print matching. (My first attempt at a layout is shown here---click on the image for a larger view of it). You would need the ability to fix one photo, and save that setting and have it applied to all of your images automatically (if you choose) so it probably couldn't be an Adjustment layer after all.

Years ago the Adobe Gamma plug-in let you do something along these lines, tweaking your screen color, but it affected the entire monitor---I just want to change the image on screen in the easiest way possible.

Now, as you can see this is NOT a fully developed idea--just me thinking out loud, but I'd like to hear your comments and suggestions for something like this---an alternate way to make our prints match the monitor by non-destructively adjusting the image on screen so it matches the print, without using Curves or Levels, and without changing the monitor color or brightness.

Now before you post a comment, keep these things in mind:
(a) This would be designed to help the thousands and thousands of people who don't understand (or feel comfortable with) Color Balance, Curves, Levels or Hue/Sat to fix their colors, so don't suggest existing Photoshop fixes.
(b) Don't post mean things--I'm just thinking out loud, and don't say arrogant or mean things about people who can't get today's color management to work for them. It's a real problem, and I'm trying to help devise a way to help them--we're all in this together.
(c) Please don't post as Anonymous, so I can address your ideas when I post.
(d) The goal here is to come up with the simplest fix possible: the less checkboxes and sliders---the better. Think: "Color management for third-graders."
(e) The best idea wins a prize (I'll get you a signed copy of Matt's great new "Photoshop Speed Clinic" book).

Thanks for joining in, and let's see where this goes---could be fun! :)

Scott

Wednesday, April 05, 2006

Happy Birthday Photoshop News.com!


A big congratulations, and happy birthday wishes to our friends over at PhotoshopNews.com, who are celebrating their first anniversary! What a great first year it's been for them, and we wish them all the very best in 2006! Stop by and help them blow out the candles. :-)

Tuesday, April 04, 2006

COOL STUFF: Once in a Lifetime....

I got this forwarded from my friend Liz Bulger, and reading it can change your life in a very profound and significant way. He's what it read: "On Wednesday of this week, at two minutes and three seconds after 1:00 in the morning, the time and date will be 01:02:03 04/05/06. That won't ever happen again). It really makes you stop and think, doesn't it? ;-)

6 Megapixels + JPEG = :-)


Last week I took my son on a "Father and Son" weekend trip out West, and since it was just for fun, I didn't want to take my 12 megapixel D2X and a camera bag full of lenses, so instead I took my backup body (a 6-megapixel Nikon D70s with a 18-200mm lens I borrowed from my buddy Larry Becker). Since I wasn't doing "serious photography," I shot in JPEG (rather than Raw), but used the Fine quality setting and the largest size my D70s will shoot. But I have to tell you: I had a smile on my face the whole time, because while on my D2X shooting in Raw I get 198 shots per 4GB memory card, the same memory card used in my D70 (shooting in JPEG fine mode), gave me a whopping 1,100+ shots. I may never shoot raw again. ;-)

Monday, April 03, 2006

NEWS: A Photoshop April Fools Tricks?

My buddy Dave Cuerdon sent me this one, and it's gotta be an April Fools Joke (right?). It's a new set of actions from Craig's Actions that removes the clothes from photos of people (OK, just writing that last sentenace pretty much confirms that it's an April Fools Joke, but it's a well done one at that). Check out his site (it's pretty elaborate for an April Fools Joke) and move your cursor over the examples (note: the models don't become nude, but the photos are a bit cheeky, so be forewarned). Check it out at http://www.craigsactions.com/naturalizers.html

NEWS: Photoshop TV Final Figures!


Just got the email from our Web boss Jim Gilbert, and for the Month of March Photoshop TV was downloaded a whoopping 1,514,110 times! We passed the one million downloads mark for March right before Photshop World (Which started on March 22nd), and we picked up some serious velocity from then on. Thanks to everyone for helping us spread the word (by the way, the new episode should be online today). :-)